Nathan’s Musings

30 December, 2005

A trip to Poland

Filed under: Other stuff — Administrator @ 11:29

As usual, I am spending the holidays visiting my sister in Poland—specifically, in Wroclaw (Breslau), a city of about 700,000 people in the Lower Silesia, the south-western region of Poland which was restored to Polish rule in 1945 following more than 200 years as part of Germany. In fact, the entire western part of Poland was under German rule until the end of World War II. Following the war, the entire country was effectively moved westwards; the eastern parts were ceded to the then Soviet Union (and today form parts of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus) while the eastern parts of Germany were ceded to Poland. There was a corresponding movement of people: what became western Poland was emptied of its German population which was resettled in the new East Germany, while the newly Polish lands were settled by Polish refugees from the lost eastern parts.

Of course, this is not how history was taught when I was a child in Communist Poland in the 1960s. Back then, we were taught the official party line that Wroclaw and the surrounding region was ancient Polish land which was returned to its rightful owners. No mention was made of the Germans forcibly resettled to our “democratic” neighbours DDR. Aside from the occasional Protestant church and the architecture of old Wroclaw there were hardly any traces left of the city’s German heritage. Given what happened between 1939 and 1945 this is perhaps not surprising. Likewise, no traces were left of the large Jewish and Czech populations. The official propaganda was simply that Wroclaw had always been a Polish city and nothing else. For those who want to learn about the history of this city and indeed this entire corner of Central Europe, Norman Davies’s excellent book “Microcosm—A History of a European City” is highly recommended.

Since the fall of Communism in 1989 the picture has become much more nuanced. While the issue of the German heritage is still very touchy (Poland is a strongly nationalistic country), the Jewish heritage is being stressed much more—there is even a Jewish school, although I wonder who goes there given the small number of Jews remaining in Poland. And even the German origins of Wroclaw are now much more important in the official picture of the city—one suspects this has as much to do with capitalizing on the many elderly German tourists who come here as with an desire to redress historical inaccuracies. But whatever the motive, this more nuanced image has made Wroclaw a much more interesting, and frankly more attractive city during the past 15 years.

However, here is one decidedly unattractive remnant of German architecture: the Jahrhunderhalle was built in 1913 to commemorate the centenary of the liberation of the city from a brief occupation by Napoleon. Even though the building is from long before the Nazi period, I am sure the Nazis loved it. Indeed, Hitler gave a major speech there before 10,000 enthusiastic supporters during a campaign rally in 1932.

Amazingly, the building survived the war and the Communists renamed it Hala Ludowa, or People’s Hall. Today, it is partly a concert arena, partly office space.

On this trip, I also visited Gdansk (Danzig) for the first time in my life. This is quite a city. It has a rich past as a member of the Hanseatic League. More recently, the first shots of World War II were fired here on 1st September 1939; and still more recently, this is the city that more than any other place is associated with successive worker revolts, the rise of the Solidarity trade union at the Gdansk Shipyard and the whole chain of subsequent events that culminated in 1989-90 with the fall of Communism in Eastern and Central Europe.

Interestingly, in Gdansk there is a similar trend to re-emphasize the city’s international heritage, probably for both internal consumption and for the tourists. In several restaurants and other public places, old German maps of the city are used as decorations. Definitely a place worth a visit!

20 December, 2005

Falling on the sword

Filed under: Thoughts from my car — Administrator @ 15:51

Japanese business can be criticized for many things. Certainly the country has not managed its economy particularly well during the past 10-15 years, although it appears that now the economy is finally coming out of its slump. However, the one feature of Japanese business that I find refreshingly attractive compared to Europe or the US is that the top leaders are prepared to take responsibility when things go wrong on their watch. Take, for example, today’s resignation of Tokyo Stock Exchange president Takuo Tsurushima following the trading error last week which cost a Japanese investment bank several hundred million dollars. The error happened when a trader entered an order to sell 610 000 shares of a certain stock for 1 Yen each instead of the intended trade, which was 1 share for 610 000 Yen. The bank subsequently tried to cancel the erroneous order but was unable to do so because of a glitch in the Tokyo Stock Exchange’s computer system. So now the exchange’s chief takes the blame and resigns, along with two other senior executives.

If this had happened in Europe or the US, the most likely outcome would have been that the hapless trader and possibly a couple of low-level computer guys at the stock exchange would have been sacked, some lawyers would earn good fees in the ensuing legal actions, but certainly the top guys would not even have contemplated resigning or admitting responsibility. Look at how the head of the Bank of Italy has clung to his chair despite several months of scandals and allegations surrounding the bank. Or take some of the recent high-profile CEO departures in the US–the size of the golden parachutes these people receive is such that the rest of us can only dream of being fired on such terms.

But apparently the Japanese culture is different. Yes, the top guy makes the big money like anywhere else; but he (because in Japan it is invariably a he) at least is prepared to face the consequences when something goes wrong. In the old days he might have been expected to commit seppuku; fortunately, we live in more enlightened times and such drastic measures are no longer necessary.

18 December, 2005

Subsidiarity

Filed under: Thoughts from my car — Administrator @ 10:11

The 10th Amendment to the US Constitution reads as follows:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to
the people.

That is pretty clear language. Those guys working on the text 220 years ago knew what they were doing.

Fast forward to modern times. The European Union has a similar principle, called subsidiarity. It is defined thusly in the now defunct European constitution (defunct because it was rejected by French and Dutch voters and would most likely have been rejected by UK and Danish voters as well):

Under the principle of subsidiarity, in areas which do not fall within its exclusive competence, the Union shall act only if and insofar as the objectives of the proposed action cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, either at central level or at regional and local level, but can rather, by reason of the scale or effects of the proposed action, be better achieved at Union level. The institutions of the Union shall apply the principle of subsidiarity as laid down in the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality. National Parliaments shall ensure compliance with that principle in accordance with the procedure set out in that Protocol.

This is how language has evolved in the past two centuries…

Legislating correct thought

Filed under: Thoughts from my car — Administrator @ 9:35

On Friday I heard on the radio that the Communications Minister of the Central African Republic has ordered the country’s radio stations to stop playing sexist songs. Apparently, the CAR has a tradition of popular songs which are demeaning to women. This is interesting on several levels. I cannot help but notice that democratic countries do not have “communications ministers” for the simple reason that there would be little for them to do. Sure, the government ministers may have press spokespersons, and every Western country has some type of regulatory agency for the telecommunications and broadcasting sectors; but these agencies are concerned with things like the cost of telephone calls and fair allocation of radio spectrum, not with what type of songs the radio stations play. Countries with a dodgy record on freedom of expression are the ones with communications ministries.

Aside from being slightly ridiculous, this story got me thinking about the broader issue of the limits on freedom of speech. Even in the most democratic countries there are limits on what you can say. There is the classic example of yelling “Fire” in a crowded theatre, but more subtly, many countries do try to limit racist or other unpleasant expression by legislation. For example, in Austria it is illegal to deny the Holocaust; in Germany it is illegal to display the swastika–perhaps understandable, given the history of these two countries. But it goes further: according to paragraph 266b of the Danish penal code, anyone who publicly “threatens, demeans or insults a group of people defined by its race, colour, national or ethnic origin, religion or sexual orientation” can be punished by up to 2 years in prison. In the past politicians have been punished (usually fined) for saying that the immigrants “breed like rats” and similar things. The anti-immigrant Danish People’s Party (whose members have often been in trouble with this particular law) wants to abolish this “racism paragraph”, and for once I agree with them. I believe that trying to legislate political correctness is wrong in principle and stupid in practice, since it simply drives the racists underground and radicalizes them further. It is better to let the idiots express themselves and be judged in the court of public opinion instead of a court of law.

Someone once said, “I hate what you say, but I will fight for your right to say it.” This pretty much sums up my own view.

16 December, 2005

Dementia on the increase

Filed under: Thoughts from my car — Administrator @ 16:04

I hear on the radio that researchers project a large increase in the incidence of dementia during the next two decades. I am sure that Republican strategists are very happy to hear that–it should guarantee continued Republican majorities in the next several Presidential elections ;-)

Crime and punishment

Filed under: Thoughts from my car — Administrator @ 15:59

The death penalty has been much in the news the last couple of weeks. First there was the unfortunate Australian drug smuggler who made the silly mistake of transiting through Singapore with his 400 grams of heroin and was hanged earlier this month in accordance with Singapore’s strict drug laws. And then earlier this week there was the former leader of the Crips gang who was executed in California by lethal injection after spending 24 years on Death Row following a quadruple murder conviction. The hysteria around his execution should not obscure the fact that the death penalty is an archaic form of punishment which is no longer used by the vast majority of democratic countries–to my knowledge, the USA is the only democracy that still uses it (I do not consider Singapore to be a democracy).

But the main reason that the death penalty is wrong is that mistakes will and do happen. I have no doubt that some of the 1002 executed in the USA since the death penalty was reinstated in 1977 were innocent. How many? We will never know. And anyway, what’s the point? This is the one penalty that is irreversible–once the state has killed a prisoner, it cannot be undone.

A story in today’s news illustrates the terrible risk: a man in Ohio was released yesterday after spending 7 years in prison for a murder and rape that he didn’t commit. DNA evidence has exonerated him (and incidentally pointed out another suspect). This man was lucky–he had been sentenced to only life without parole, so while 7 years of his life were taken from him, at least he is now released, reunited with his wife, and presumably will be compensated in some way. Of course the 7 years cannot be recovered, but at least he can now have some semblance of a life again. Had the state executed him, no such opportunity would exist.

That is why the death penalty is wrong.

15 December, 2005

Here is an interesting job ;-)

Filed under: Thoughts from my car — Administrator @ 18:06

Headline from yesterday’s BBC Europe news: Italian Finance Minister Giulio Tremonti has pushed through parliament a new 25% tax on all hardcore pornography. The tax is to be imposed on all films, magazines and merchandise of the type sold in sex shops.

A couple of thoughts come to mind: firstly, I would love to read the actual text of the law, particularly the definition of “hard core” vs. “soft” porn. Secondly, I wonder how the Italian tax authorities will enforce the new levy. Will there be an army of tax auditors prowling the sex shops of Italian cities to check what is soft and what is hard, and ensure that the latter is appropriately taxed? Sounds like hard work, but someone has to do it…

14 December, 2005

Belgium vs. Netherlands: peacekeeping forces needed

Filed under: Thoughts from my car — Administrator @ 11:48

Even though the Netherlands and Belgium are neighbours, co-founders of the EU, and even (for the most part) speak the same language, there is no love lost between the two countries. Generally, the Belgians consider the Dutch boring, stingy, puritan workaholics, while the Dutch find it difficult to take Belgium seriously as a country at all.

This year, all this has spilled into the rarified world of diplomacy. Earlier this year, the Belgian Foreign Minister de Gucht called the Dutch Prime Minister Balkenende “a rigidly petit-bourgeois Harry Potter.” Balkenende called in the Belgian ambassador and demanded a written apology, which the Belgians duly provided.

Now another Belgian minister has stepped into it. In today’s issue of the Dutch magazine Vrij Nederland, Belgium vice-premier, Freya Van den Bossche, is quoted as characterizing Dutch government ministers as “rigid, stubborn and petit-bourgeois” and generally criticises the Dutch policies, including some recent cuts in unemployement and disability benefits and other social programs (which, by any standard, remain very generous nonetheless).

Having lived in both countries for a number of years, I must say that some of the stereotypes I quoted at the beginning of this post undoubtedly have a grain of truth in them. A writer once described Brussels as “the world’s northernmost Mediterranean city,” by which he meant that it has the same virtues and vices as, say, Italian cities, although the weather is not nearly as nice. Belgium definitely has better food, much better beer, and a more relaxed lifestyle than the Netherlands. On the other hand, I will take the Dutch roads, public transport and both government and business services over their Belgian counterparts any day.

It is also a bit rich to hear a Belgian minister criticise the way the Dutch run their economy, given the two countries’ respective economic records. For example, in November 2005 Dutch unemployment stood at 6.6%; in Belgium the rate was more than double that at 13.5%. Economic growth was virtually the same in both countries, at 1.2% and 1.3% respectively, so clearly the Dutch have done a much better job of keeping people employed even in the face of anemic growth.

Well, hopefully we will not need the UN’s blue helmets along the border. Let us just settle our differences over a (Belgian) beer.

12 December, 2005

China: business vs. human rights

Filed under: Thoughts from my car — Administrator @ 12:06

In the rush to cash in on China’s economic boom, we in the West are prepared to overlook the worst human rights abuses. Take the recent shooting of villagers protesting the expropriation of their homes to make room for a power station–yes, the official who gave the order has apparently been arrested, but one cannot help wonder whether his crime (in the eyes of Beijing) was giving the order to shoot or the negative publicity it has generated around the world. After all, this type of thing goes on in China on a regular basis, and most of the time the authorities succeed in keeping things off the front pages of Western newspapers and off our evening newscasts.

The failure of Western democracies to exert even symbolic pressure on the Chinese regime is a disgrace. It seems that everything pales in the face of 9% economic growth and big, juicy orders to the likes of Boeing and Airbus. Of course it is terrible that villagers get kicked off their land, women are forced to have abortions if they violate the one-child policy, human rights lawyers are thrown in jail–but there is that huge market (although so far precious few Western investments have actually made any money), and after all, in the words of another dictator, you cannot make an omelette without breaking eggs, right?

Think about it next time you are looking at that $29.95 DVD player in a shop…

10 December, 2005

World Cup

Filed under: Thoughts from my car — Administrator @ 5:50

Last night the draw for the World Cup was made in Germany. It is great to have this event next door, and maybe I will be able to go to some games. Unfortunately, the country I always support–Denmark–did not qualify this time, so instead of being a raving maniac on the days when Denmark plays, I can enjoy the tournament as a dispassionate football feinschmecker.

The full draw is here. It is obvious that each of the eight groups has two clear favourites to go through to the second round: Germany and Poland (group A), England and Sweden (group B), Argentina and Holland (group C), Mexico and Portugal (group D), Brazil and Croatia (group F), France and Switzerland (group G), Spain and Ukraine (group H).

The attentive reader will note that group E is missing from the above list. That group, which includes Italy, the Czech Republic, the USA and Ghana, is in my opinion the toughest of the groups and the hardest to predict. Every other group has a team which can reasonably be expected to be the doormat of the group, except group E. All four teams are good enough to make it to the round of 16. I will go out on a limb and pick the Czech Republic and the USA to make it from group E. Italy have a tradition of underperforming. The USA has a good side that is getting better with each World Cup. Even though professional football (soccer) is not very popular over there, it matters little, since most of the USA players play their club football in the best league in the world, the English Premiership.

I will go further out on a limb and predict that France will surprise everyone and fail to make it out of the group stage. Instead, Switzerland and South Korea will advance from group G.

Isn’t this fun? Check back in 6 1/2 months and see if I was right or crazy…

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress